IRGC sources fume over U.S. 'deception' on Strait of Hormuz deal, weigh re-escalation

According to reports reviewed by The Zioneer Intelligence Desk on Sunday night, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is experiencing significant internal turmoil following the recent diplomatic arrangements in the Persian Gulf. Sources within the paramilitary organization claim that while Tehran fulfilled its obligation to open the Strait of Hormuz, the reciprocal benefits promised by Washington have failed to materialize beyond limited oil-related sanctions relief.

Internal Blame and Diplomatic Friction

The anger within the IRGC is not only directed outward but also toward the Iranian officials who facilitated the negotiations. Specifically, sources named Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf as targets of internal criticism for their roles in leading the talks with the Americans. The IRGC leadership reportedly feels that the diplomatic track has left Iran at a strategic disadvantage, particularly following the Israel-Lebanon agreement, which the IRGC views as a direct violation of a prior memorandum of understanding.

Threats to Maritime Stability

As a result of this perceived betrayal, IRGC officials are reportedly considering a "re-escalation" in the Strait of Hormuz. This includes the possibility of renewing disruptions to the waterway, which serves as a vital artery for global energy supplies. The tension is further exacerbated by a U.S. demand that maritime traffic be diverted through the Omani side of the strait, a move the IRGC interprets as an infringement on its asserted control over the passage. While the situation remains developing, the shift in rhetoric suggests a potential pivot away from the relative calm sought by the recent Islamabad MOU.