31°46′40.7″N 35°14′07.7″E
Top Stories
The Wire
← The Wire
Statecraft · Dispatch · PoliticalDeveloping

MK Rothman: A judge ruling on how judges are appointed in a democracy is a criminal

The Zioneer Intelligence DeskUpdated 14:49
MK Rothman: A judge ruling on how judges are appointed in a democracy is a criminal

Primary source Internal intake · 2 reviewed intake signals · Desk window 14:26–14:49

TL;DR

Constitution Committee Chairman MK Simcha Rothman (Religious Zionism) on Sunday called any justice who rules on how judges are appointed in a democratic state, and on a Basic Law passed by 68 MKs, a "criminal." His statement came as the High Court sitting with an expanded panel heard petitions against the judicial selection reform he co-authored.

01 · THE DISPATCH

MK Simcha Rothman, the chairman of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee and a lead architect of the judicial selection reform, issued a sharp condemnation Sunday as the High Court of Justice heard petitions against the law. In a statement released at 14:25, Rothman said: "A judge who rules on how judges are appointed in a democratic state, and on a Basic Law passed by the Knesset with a majority of 68 MKs, is a criminal!"

The comment escalates the rhetoric around the hearing, which opened at 09:08 with an expanded 11-justice panel — the same format used during the 2024 reasonableness-standard debate. As The Zioneer reported earlier Sunday, Supreme Court President Isaac Amit warned the hearing that the reform constitutes a "regime change." Rothman's language directly challenges the court's authority to review Basic Laws, a constitutional question central to the petitions.

The statement does not call for specific action, and it remains unclear whether Rothman is expressing a personal opinion or signaling a coalition legislative response if the court strikes down the amendment.

Related dispatches
03 · Source and signal

Source and signal

  • Internal intake
Desk accountability

This dispatch is published under The Zioneer Intelligence Desk. Raw intake channels remain internal provenance; an external outlet or channel is named only when it materially helps readers evaluate a specific claim.