The Lead
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed for the first time that senior defense officials deliberately chose not to wake him on the morning of the October 7, 2023 Hamas invasion, according to reports on Tuesday. The allegation marks a significant escalation in the Prime Minister's public friction with the security establishment regarding the failures that led to the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has introduced a new and severe allegation into the ongoing national debate over the October 7 failures, claiming that the decision to keep him uninformed during the early hours of the Hamas invasion was intentional. According to reports by The Times of Israel and other outlets on Tuesday night, Netanyahu asserted that if he had been woken, the outcome of the day's events would have been different.
Escalating Friction
This claim represents the most direct accusation Netanyahu has leveled against the defense leadership to date. While the Prime Minister has previously discussed the lack of a timely update, this is the first instance where the term "deliberately" has been applied to the actions of security officials. The Prime Minister's account suggests a breakdown in the chain of command that was not merely a technical failure but a conscious choice by top-tier officials.
Context of the Allegation
The timing and nature of the Prime Minister's notification on October 7 have been a central point of contention. As The Zioneer reported earlier, previous accounts from Netanyahu and his supporters have highlighted that he was only fully briefed after the invasion was well underway. In July, Netanyahu told journalist Sharon Gal that security officials feared a "miscalculation" and that he would have ordered a preemptive strike had he been involved in the pre-dawn discussions. Similar allegations were previously voiced by former intelligence figures such as Tamir Morag, who claimed that Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar failed to notify the Prime Minister despite signs of unusual activity.
Analysis and Outlook
The security establishment has yet to issue a formal response to this specific allegation of deliberate exclusion. The claim adds further weight to the calls for a State Commission of Inquiry into the events of October 7, as it highlights a fundamental dispute between the political and military leadership over the integrity of the command structure. For the Israeli public, the assertion deepens the questions surrounding the "conceptzia"—the failed strategic assessment of Hamas—and whether internal friction between the Prime Minister's Office and the defense brass hampered the immediate response to the terror group's assault.
2 developments
- Netanyahu's Oct. 7 Testimony: Claims Shin Bet Lowballed Threat, 'Jericho Wall' Plan HiddenRelated analysis
- UAE sources decline to confirm or deny reports of pre-Oct. 7 warning call to NetanyahuRelated analysis
- Military sources say PM criticized Air Force commander's letter as a 'mistake'Related analysis
- Haaretz alleges Netanyahu concealed UAE warning about Oct. 7 attack; PM calls report 'absolute lie'Related analysis
- The Zioneer releases second chapter of Netanyahu's Oct. 7 account; details first hours and Jericho Wall concealment
- Video appears to show US sinking five Iranian oil tankers in retaliation for destroyer attack
- Houthi capture of Camp Khalid, Hayz reshapes Red Sea security balance, analysis finds
- IRGC Reportedly Launches Missiles Toward Strait of Hormuz
