Trump: US will strike Iran's Mount Makosh 'fairly soon', Iran hasn't seen anything yet

The statements mark a significant escalation in American rhetoric regarding the direct kinetic conflict that has intensified since July 2026. President Trump’s focus on Mount Makosh follows reports suggesting the site is being used to store enriched uranium and thousands of centrifuges. "We will definitely attack the new site they are talking about," Trump stated, adding that Iran "hasn't seen anything yet." He emphasized that the U.S. would strike the area "fairly soon" and with heavy force.

Strategic Context and Regional Pressure The meeting with Joseph Aoun, who has led Lebanon toward a more sovereign stance away from Iranian influence since 2025, provided a backdrop for Trump to outline the broader U.S. strategy. The President linked Iranian regional activities to domestic U.S. concerns, accusing Tehran of attempting to influence the upcoming midterm elections through its actions in the Strait of Hormuz. This strategic waterway remains a primary flashpoint, where the U.S. maintains a naval blockade following the collapse of previous diplomatic frameworks.

Analysis of the Threat By naming Mount Makosh, the U.S. administration is signaling that its intelligence on the Iranian nuclear program is actionable and that hardened underground facilities are no longer off-limits. Trump’s assessment that Iran would need 20-25 years to recover from continued U.S. pressure suggests a policy aimed at long-term containment or structural degradation of the regime's military-industrial complex. While the President described past U.S. actions as "nice," his current stance indicates a shift toward more destructive strikes against high-value infrastructure.

Outlook and Regional Implications The immediate focus remains on the timing of the promised strike on Mount Makosh. As the U.S. air campaign continues against strategic sites across Iran, the inclusion of nuclear-adjacent facilities represents a broadening of the target set. Israeli security assessments suggest that significant strikes against Iranian power plants, oil infrastructure, or senior officials could trigger direct Iranian retaliation against Israeli territory. For now, the U.S. maintains that it will not exit the conflict until the Iranian leadership, which Trump described as "very evil people," is no longer a threat.