31°46′40.7″N 35°14′07.7″E
Top Stories
The Wire
← The Wire
Statecraft · Dispatch · PoliticalDeveloping

Gadi Eisenkot slams immunity for MK Gotliv, says it spits in the face of security personnel

The Zioneer Intelligence DeskUpdated 15:56
Gadi Eisenkot slams immunity for MK Gotliv, says it spits in the face of security personnel

Primary source Internal intake · 1 reviewed intake signal · Desk window 15:55–15:56

TL;DR

Opposition MK and former IDF chief Gadi Eisenkot (Yesh Atid) said Wednesday that granting MK Tally Gotliv parliamentary immunity is a spit in the face of Israeli security personnel who risk their lives. Eisenkot's statement was reported by N12.

01 · THE DISPATCH

Opposition MK Gadi Eisenkot (Yesh Atid) sharply condemned the Knesset's decision Wednesday to grant MK Tally Gotliv (Likud) parliamentary immunity. Eisenkot said a situation in which elected officials endanger Israeli security and use their immunity as a safe haven from the law is a spit in the face of the fighters and security personnel — including Israelis who voted for Likud and coalition parties in the last election, he added. The remark, reported by N12's channel, comes minutes after the Knesset plenum voted 62-48 to approve Gotliv's immunity. The Zioneer reported earlier that the Attorney General had warned the immunity would endanger the state and soldiers, and that the Shin Bet found Gotliv had endangered a senior service member and his family. Opponents of the measure, including coalition MKs such as Yuli Edelstein, also voted against it, questioning the double standard. A prior bulletin noted Minister Ze'ev Elkin said he would support the immunity. Eisenkot's statement adds a sharp security-focused rebuke to the debate.

Related dispatches
03 · Source and signal

Source and signal

A single-sourced dispatch is never rated Confirmed or Strong. Its Signal strengthens only when a second, independent source corroborates it.

  • Internal intake
Desk accountability

This dispatch is published under The Zioneer Intelligence Desk. Raw intake channels remain internal provenance; an external outlet or channel is named only when it materially helps readers evaluate a specific claim.