The Supreme Court is hearing petitions filed by opposition parties and the Israel Bar Association seeking to annul the Knesset's election of attorney Michael Ravilo as state comptroller. Petitioners argue the secret ballot was compromised by coalition lawmakers documenting their votes. Likud and the prime minister oppose the cancellation as unprecedented judicial overreach.
The Supreme Court on Sunday began hearing a series of petitions seeking to cancel the Knesset's appointment of attorney Michael Ravilo as state comptroller. The petitions, filed by the Movement for Quality Government, the Blue and White and Yesh Atid factions, and the Israel Bar Association, center on allegations that coalition lawmakers documented their votes during the secret ballot, violating the principle of secrecy and compromising the integrity of the election.
The petitioners argue that the documentation—which they describe as a 'loyalty test'—was a flagrant breach of procedure that should invalidate the outcome. Likud and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have submitted responses opposing the petitions, warning that canceling a Knesset decision reached in a secret vote would set a dangerous and unprecedented precedent, undermining parliamentary authority.
The hearing comes after weeks of legal exchanges, with multiple parties weighing in. A decision is not expected immediately. The court's ruling could have significant implications for the independence of the state comptroller and the balance of power between the Knesset and the judiciary.
5 developments
- StrongHigh Court justices propose new Knesset vote for state comptroller, await response by Sunday
- DevelopingPM tells High Court revoking Ravilo appointment would be unprecedented
- DevelopingSupreme Court panel set for state comptroller petitions
- DevelopingSupreme Court justices named for Yesh Atid petition to disqualify state comptroller vote
Source and signal
- Internal intake