31°46′40.7″N 35°14′07.7″E
Top Stories
The Wire
← The Wire
Statecraft · Dispatch · PoliticalStrong

Court rules Dan Harel defamed MK Zvi Sukkot, Yossi Dagan; orders compensation

The Zioneer Intelligence DeskUpdated 11:45

Primary source Internal intake · 3 reviewed intake signals · Desk window 11:43–11:45

TL;DR

A court in the Central District ruled Monday that former IDF general Dan Harel defamed MK Zvi Sukkot (Religious Zionism) and Samaria Regional Council head Yossi Dagan, ordering him to pay tens of thousands of shekels in compensation. The judge found Harel lied when he claimed that a battalion and a half had been diverted to guard Sukkot in Huwara before October 7. Sukkot stated: "Whoever slanders will pay, and big."

01 · THE DISPATCH

A magistrate's court in the Central District ruled on Monday that former IDF Southern Command chief Dan Harel must pay compensation to MK Zvi Sukkot (Religious Zionism) and Samaria Regional Council head Yossi Dagan for defamation. The court found that Harel lied during a television interview by claiming that a battalion and a half of IDF soldiers had been diverted to guard Sukkot's sukkah in Huwara prior to the October 7 massacre. Judge Mizrahi rejected Harel's counterclaim and sharply criticized his statements. The compensation amount was set at tens of thousands of shekels. In response, Sukkot said: "Whoever slanders will pay, and big." Dagan stated: "The blood of the residents of Samaria will not be abandoned — we will never keep silent about slander and lies." The ruling follows a previous bulletin by The Zioneer reporting that Harel was ordered to pay 35,000 NIS to Sukkot.

02 · How it developed

2 developments

  1. Latest

    Court also awarded compensation to Samaria Regional Council head Yossi Dagan.

  2. Former IDF general Dan Harel ordered to pay NIS 35,000 to MK Zvi Sukkot for libel

Related dispatches
03 · Source and signal

Source and signal

  • Internal intake
Desk accountability

This dispatch is published under The Zioneer Intelligence Desk. Raw intake channels remain internal provenance; an external outlet or channel is named only when it materially helps readers evaluate a specific claim.